Образование и право2076-150310.24412/2076-1503-2026-5-79-84OtherЗАРУБЕЖНЫЙ ОПЫТ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ПРОЦЕДУР АЛЬТЕРНАТИВНОГО РАЗРЕШЕНИЯ СПОРОВ МЕЖДУ МЕДИЦИНСКИМИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯМИ И ПАЦИЕНТАМИFOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES BETWEEN HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS AND PATIENTSГубановаАделина ОлеговнаGubanovaAdelina Olegovnaadelina.gubanova@bk.ruBachelor of Law with knowledge of foreign languages, a student in International, Private and Public Law, at MGIMO University of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, a junior associate at the Department of Legal Adviceбакалавр юриспруденции со знанием иностранных языков, студент магистратуры по направлению, «Международное, частное и публичное право», МГИМО МИД России, младший юрист отдела юридического консультирования, ООО «ДРТ Консалтинг»27052026579841004202627052026

В статье рассматривается опыт Китая, США и Индонезии в применении средств альтернативного разрешения споров (далее – «АРС») в отношениях между медицинскими организациями и пациентами. Анализируются правовые основы, процедуры и практика использования средств АРС в здравоохранении. В ходе проведенного исследования автор приходит к выводам, что эффективность использования средств АРС в здравоохранении напрямую зависит от уровня нормативной детализации, развития институциональной инфраструктуры и доверия со стороны общества

The article examines the experience of China, the United States, and Indonesia in applying alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms in the context of relationships between medical institutions and patients. Itanalyzes the legal frameworks, procedures, and practical implementation of ADRmethods in the healthcare sector. The study concludes that the effectiveness of ADR in healthcare directly depends on the level of regulatory detail, the development of institutional infrastructure, and the degree of public trust

альтернативное разрешение споровмедицинские спорымедиацияарбитражпереговорыКитайСШАИндонезияКалифорнияФлоридаalternative dispute resolutionmedical disputesmediationarbitrationnegotiationChinaUSAIndonesiaCaliforniaFloridaAdiputra R., Sihotang E., Wiratny Awangga N.K., Arif. Settlement of Medical Disputes After Law No. 17 of 2023 Concerning Health. JILPR. 2025. Vol. 6, No. 2. P. 1-6.Fakih M., Natamiharja R., Mirza I.M.M., Pratama A.A., Oktarlina R.Z. Resolving Medical Disputes: Lessons from U.S. Arbitration for Indonesia’s Legal Framework Hasanuddin LawReview. 2025. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 148–160.Harris D.M. Medical Malpractice in the People‘s Republic of China: The 2002 Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2005. Vol. 33, No. 3. P. 456–477.Nurchasanah, Sakti M., Nugroho A.A. Juridical Analysis of LawNumber 17 of 2023 Concerning Health on Legal Protection for Medical and Health Personnel. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities. 2025. Vol. 4, No. 2. P. 2348–2352.Ramadhanti D.A., Lany A. A Judicial Analysis of the Need for Medical Dispute Court in Resolving Health Disputes. Research Horizon. 2025. Vol. 5, No. 6. P. 2867–2874.Tang C. Medical negligence dispute resolution in China: social stability and preventative measures. Amicus Curiae. Series 2. 2021. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 268–289.Wang M, Liu GG, Zhao H, Butt T, Yang M, Cui Y. M The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China. BMCHealth Serv Res.. 2020. Vol. 20(1). P. 1–9.Wardani Y.K., Fakih M., Sunaryo. Comparison of Health Dispute Mediation Mechanisms in Indonesia and ASEAN Countries // GPH. 2025. Vol. 8, No. 5. P. 74-79.Widjaja G. Mediation asToll to Settle Medical Disputes; Indonesian Case. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020. Vol. 472. P. 37–39.Adiputra R., Sihotang E., Wiratny Awangga N.K., Arif. Settlement of Medical Disputes After Law No. 17 of 2023 Concerning Health. JILPR. 2025. Vol. 6, No. 2. P. 1-6.Fakih M., Natamiharja R., Mirza I.M.M., Pratama A.A., Oktarlina R.Z. Resolving Medical Disputes: Lessons from U.S. Arbitration for Indonesia’s Legal Framework Hasanuddin LawReview. 2025. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 148–160.Harris D.M. Medical Malpractice in the People‘s Republic of China: The 2002 Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2005. Vol. 33, No. 3. P. 456–477.Nurchasanah, Sakti M., Nugroho A.A. Juridical Analysis of LawNumber 17 of 2023 Concerning Health on Legal Protection for Medical and Health Personnel. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities. 2025. Vol. 4, No. 2. P. 2348–2352.Ramadhanti D.A., Lany A. A Judicial Analysis of the Need for Medical Dispute Court in Resolving Health Disputes. Research Horizon. 2025. Vol. 5, No. 6. P. 2867–2874.Tang C. Medical negligence dispute resolution in China: social stability and preventative measures. Amicus Curiae. Series 2. 2021. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 268–289.Wang M, Liu GG, Zhao H, Butt T, Yang M, Cui Y. M The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China. BMCHealth Serv Res.. 2020. Vol. 20(1). P. 1–9.Wardani Y.K., Fakih M., Sunaryo. Comparison of Health Dispute Mediation Mechanisms in Indonesia and ASEAN Countries // GPH. 2025. Vol. 8, No. 5. P. 74-79.Widjaja G. Mediation asToll to Settle Medical Disputes; Indonesian Case. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 2020. Vol. 472. P. 37–39.