<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и право</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2076-1503</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2076-1503-2026-3-172-178</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">ПРОМЕДЛЕНИЕ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫХ ОРГАНОВ: ПРОБЛЕМА ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТИ СУДЕБНОЙ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВА НА РАССМОТРЕНИЕ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОГО ДЕЛА В РАЗУМНЫЕ СРОКИ НА ПРИМЕРЕ СОЕДИНЕННЫХ ШТАТОВ АМЕРИКИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>AGENCY DELAY: THE PROBLEM OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHT TO TIMELY AGENCY ADJUDICATION IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Калитовский</surname><given-names>Тимофей Валентинович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kalitovskiy</surname><given-names>Timofey Valentinovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>me@kalitovskiy.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">2nd year master’s student at the International Law School, of the Federal state autonomous institution of higher education, “Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation”</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">студент 2 курса магистратуры, Международно-правового факультета Федерального, государственного автономного образовательного учреждения, высшего образования «Московский государственный институт, международных отношений (университет) Министерства, иностранных дел Российской Федерации»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-03"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-03-12"><day>12</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-04-03"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></history><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="publication-e690a291-656f-411e-9864-330b47c0dc5d.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Статья посвящена вопросу промедления административных ведомств США в контексте их общей обязанности по рассмотрению административных дел в разумные сроки. Особое внимание уделяется проблемам терминологии, используемой в Законе об административной процедуре 1946 г., подходам судов к разрешению обозначенной проблемы, а также выработанной имипрактики разрешения споров об административном промедлении</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>The article is dedicated to the issue of agency delays in the USA in the context of their general duty to resolve administrative cases within a reasonable time. Particular attention is paid to terminological issues arising under the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946, judicial approaches to this problem, and the body of case lawdeveloped for the resolution of administrative delay disputes.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>административное дело</kwd><kwd>административное промедление</kwd><kwd>адми нистративное ведомство</kwd><kwd>административное правоприменение</kwd><kwd>административное бездействие</kwd><kwd>судебный контроль</kwd><kwd>разумный срок</kwd><kwd>закон об административных процедурах</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>administrativnoe delo</kwd><kwd>administrativnoe promedlenie</kwd><kwd>admi nistrativnoe vedomstvo</kwd><kwd>administrativnoe pravoprimenenie</kwd><kwd>administrativnoe bezdeystvie</kwd><kwd>sudebnyy kontrol</kwd><kwd>razumnyy srok</kwd><kwd>zakon obadministrativnykh protsedurakh</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Administrative Conference of the United States. Adoption of Recommendations // Federal Register. – 2024. – Т. 89. – С. 1509-1517.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Gavoor A. A., Platt S. A. Agency Delay and the Courts //Administrative LawReview. – 2025. – Т. 77. – С. 761-830.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Gersen J. E., O’Connell A. J. Deadlines in administrative law // University of Pennsylvania LawReview. – 2007. – Т. 156. – С. 923-1008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Kim B. Missed statutory deadlines and miss ingagency resources: Reviving historical mandamus doctrine // Columbia LawReview. – 2021. – Т. 121. – С. 1481-1516.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Lee S. F. Administrative Delays Involving Social Security Disability Claims: Heckler v. DayRevisited // Administrative LawJournal – 1988. – Т. 2. – С. 191-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Pierce R. J., Jr. Administrative LawTreatise. – 5-е изд. // Aspen Publishers, 2010. – 2241 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Pierce R. J., Jr. Administrative Law (Concepts and Insights Series). – 4th ed. – St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2024. – 220 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Sant’Ambrogio M. D. Agency Delays: How a Principal-Agent Approach CanInform Judicial and Executive Branch Review of Agency Foot-Dragging // George Washington LawReview. – 2010. – Т. 79. – С. 1381-1448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Attorney General’s Manual on the Adminis trative Procedure Act. – Washington, D.C.: USDepartment of Justice, 1947. – 139 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Administrative Conference of the United States. Adoption of Recommendations // Federal Register. – 2024. – V. 89. – P. 1509-1517.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Gavoor A. A., Platt S. A. Agency Delay and the Courts //Administrative LawReview. – 2025. – V. 77. – P. 761-830.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Gersen J. E., O’Connell A. J. Deadlines in administrative law // University of Pennsylvania LawReview. – 2007. – V. 156. – P. 923-1008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Kim B. Missed statutory deadlines and miss ingagency resources: Reviving historical mandamus doctrine // Columbia LawReview. – 2021. – V. 121. – P. 1481-1516.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Lee S. F. Administrative Delays Involving Social Security Disability Claims: Heckler v. DayRevisited // Administrative LawJournal – 1988. – V. 2. – P. 191-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Pierce R. J., Jr. Administrative LawTreatise. – 5th ed. // Aspen Publishers, 2010. – 2241 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Pierce R. J., Jr. Administrative Law (Concepts and Insights Series). – 4th ed. – St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2024. – 220 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Sant’Ambrogio M. D. Agency Delays: How a Principal-Agent Approach CanInform Judicial and Executive Branch Review of Agency Foot-Dragging // George Washington LawReview. – 2010. – V. 79. – P. 1381-1448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Attorney General’s Manual on the Adminis trative Procedure Act. – Washington, D.C.: USDepartment of Justice, 1947. – 139 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
