<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и право</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2076-1503</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2076-1503-2026-3-845-851</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Проблема соотношения родительской власти и прав ребенка сквозь призму конвенции о правах ребенка 1989 г</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The problem of the relationship between parental authority and the rights of the child through the prism of the convention on the rights of the child 1989</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бадаева</surname><given-names>Марита Ильдаровна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Badayeva</surname><given-names>Marita Ildarovna</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>mbadayeva@gmail.com</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">attorney, Schwartz &amp; Partners Law Firm</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">адвокат, адвокатское бюро «Шварц и Партнеры»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-10"><day>10</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><issue>3</issue><fpage>845</fpage><lpage>851</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-03-05"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-04-03"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date></history><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="problema-sootnosheniya-roditelskoy-vlasti-i-prav-rebenka-skvoz-prizmu-konventsii-o-pravah.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В статье рассматривается одна из фундаментальных проблем семейного права – проблема понимания сущности и пределов родительской власти и ее соотношения с правами ребенка, с его личной автономией. Особое внимание автор обращает на проблему оспоримости родительской власти, задаваясь вопросом: допустимо ли рассмотрение в суде исков несовершеннолетних старше 14 лет против их родителей из ненадлежащего, по мнению ребенка, исполнения родителями их обязанностей по воспитанию? Автор предпринимает попытку проанализировать заданные вопросы сквозь призму положений основного международного договора в сфере прав ребенка – Конвенции о правах ребенка 1989 г. Автор приходит к выводу о том, что Конвенцией закреплен ряд прав, существо которых предполагает только самостоятельный способ их реализации, в связи с чем в Конвенции заложен принцип соразмерного уменьшения степени родительской власти по мере взросления ребенка. В результате исследования положений Конвенции о правах ребенка 1989 г. и доктринальных источников сделаны выводы о том, что в государствах различаются подходы относительно существа родительских прав, а именно того, чей интерес в первую очередь ими защищается – интерес ребенка в праве на получение родительской заботы или собственный интерес родителя в воспитании ребенка по своему усмотрению. Именно этот вопрос является определяющим при решении вопроса об оспоримости родительской власти.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>The article examines one of the fundamental problems of family law – the problem of understanding the essence and limits of parental authority and its relationship with the rights of the child, with his personal autonomy. The author pays special attention to the problem of the challenge of parental authority, asking the question: is it permissible to consider in court the claims of minors over the age of 14 against their parents because, in the opinion of the child, the parents improperly fulfilled their parenting duties? The author attempts to analyze the questions asked through the prism of the provisions of the main international treaty in the field of the rights of the child, the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989. The author comes to the conclusion that the Convention establishes a number of rights, the essence of which presupposes only an independent way to implement them, and therefore the Convention lays down the principle of a proportionate reduction in the degree of parental authority as the child grows up. As a result of the study of the provisions of the Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989 Conclusions have been drawn from doctrinal sources that States have different approaches regarding the essence of parental rights, namely, whose interest is primarily protected by them – the child’s interest in the right to receive parental care or the parent’s own interest in raising the child at his discretion. It is this question that is crucial when deciding on the challenge of parental authority.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>гражданское процессуальное право</kwd><kwd>семейное право</kwd><kwd>родительская власть</kwd><kwd>автономия личности несовершеннолетних</kwd><kwd>Конвенция о правах ребенка 1989 г.</kwd><kwd>конституционные права</kwd><kwd>автономия семьи</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>civil procedure law</kwd><kwd>family law</kwd><kwd>parental authority</kwd><kwd>personal autonomy of minors</kwd><kwd>Convention on the Rights of the Child of 1989</kwd><kwd>constitutional rights</kwd><kwd>family autonomy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Гражданское уложение. Книга вторая. Семейственное право. Проект Высочайше учрежденной Редакционной комиссии по составлению Гражданского Уложения. Том первый. Ст. 1 – 349. С объяснениями. – Санкт-Петербург, 1902. – 655 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Свердлов Г. Право на воспитание и судебные споры о детях. – Советское государство и право. - №5-6. – 1940. – C. 52-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Мейер Д. И. Русское гражданское право / Д. И. Мейер. – 4-е изд., испр. и доп. – Москва: Статут, 2021. – 846 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Покровский И. А. Основные проблемы гражданского права. – 6-е изд., стереот. – М.: Статут, 2013. – 351 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Рясенцев В. А. Представительство и сделки в современном гражданском праве. – М.: Статут, 2006. – 603 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Altman, S. Parental Control Rights. In Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law.: Oxford University Press. 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Guggenheim, Martin. What’s Wrong with Children’s Rights, Harvard University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Hafen, Bruce C., and Jonathan O. Hafen. “Abandoning Children to Their Autonomy: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, Spring 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">John Wall. Ethics in Light of Childhood. Georgetown University Press; 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Lee, Soo Jee. A Child’s Voice vs. a Parent’s Control: Resolving a Tension between the Convention on the Rights of the Child and U.S. Law. Columbia Law Review, vol. 117, no. 3, April 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General comment No. 12 (2009): The right of the child to be heard, CRC/C/GC/12, 20 July 2009, available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/ crc/2009/en/70207 (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923). // [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.njchs.org/ wp-content/uploads/Meyer-v.-Nebraska-1923.pdf (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925). // [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www. njchs.org/wp-content/uploads/Pierce-v.-Society-of- Sisters.pdf (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972). // [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://files. ondemandhosting.info/data/stand/case-library/1972- wisconsin-v-yoder_en.pdf (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982). // [Электронный ресурс] URL: https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/455/745/ (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Civil Code. Book Two. Family Law. Project of the Supremely Institutional Editorial Commission for Compiling the Civil Code. Volume One. Articles 1–349. With Explanations. – St. Petersburg, 1902. – 655 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Sverdlov G. The Right to Upbringing and Legal Disputes over Children. – Soviet State and Law. - No. 5-6. – 1940. – pp. 52-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Meyer D. I. Russian Civil Law / D. I. Meyer. – 4th ed., corrected. and enlarged. – Moscow: Statut, 2021. – 846 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Pokrovsky I. A. Basic Problems of Civil Law. – 6th ed., stereot. – Moscow: Statut, 2013. – 351 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Ryasentsev V. A. Representation and transactions in modern civil law. – M.: Statute, 2006. – 603 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Altman, S. Parental Control Rights. In Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law.: Oxford University Press. 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Guggenheim, Martin. What’s Wrong with Children’s Rights, Harvard University Press, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Hafen, Bruce C., and Jonathan O. Hafen. “Abandoning Children to Their Autonomy: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 2, Spring 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">John Wall. Ethics in Light of Childhood. Georgetown University Press; 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Lee, Soo Jee. A Child’s Voice vs. a Parent’s Control: Resolving a Tension between the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the U.S. Law. Columbia Law Review, vol. 117, no. 3, April 2017.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), General comment No. 12 (2009): The right of the child to be heard, CRC/C/GC/12, 20 July 2009, available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/ crc/2009/en/70207 (accessed 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923). // [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.njchs.org/ wp-content/uploads/Meyer-v.-Nebraska-1923.pdf (date accessed: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925). // [Electronic resource] URL: https://www. njchs.org/wp-content/uploads/Pierce-v.-Society-of-Sisters.pdf (date accessed: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972). // [Electronic resource] URL: https://files.ondemandhosting.info/data/stand/case-library/1972-wisconsin-v-yoder_en.pdf (accessed: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982). // [Electronic resource] URL: https://supreme. justia.com/cases/federal/us/455/745/ (accessed: 02.02.2026).</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
