<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with OASIS Tables with MathML3 v1.4 20241031//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/archiving/1.4/JATS-archive-oasis-article1-4-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и право</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2076-1503</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24412/2076-1503-2026-2-86-92</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Other</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИЯ СТАТУСА ЛИЧНОСТИ НА ЭМБРИОНЫ IN VITRO</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>PROSPECTS FOR EXTENDING PERSONALITY STATUS TO EMBRYOS IN VITRO</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кособоков</surname><given-names>Андрей Львович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kosobokov</surname><given-names>Andrey Lvovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>andreykos98@mail.ru</email></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Advisor to the Department for the Development of Supranational, Institutions in the EAEU of the Department of Eurasian Integration, of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Советник отдела развития наднациональных институтов, в ЕАЭС Департамента евразийской интеграции, Минэкономразвития России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-03-10"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><issue>2</issue><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-02-13"><day>13</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-03-10"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></date></history><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="publication-e4674844-56c7-47a2-80ef-cd9f79b44c81.pdf" xlink:title="PDF"/><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Данная статья посвящена определению перспектив признания статуса личности за эмбрионами, созданными для проведения процедуры искусственного оплодот ворения. В этих целях была исследована судебная практика США и ряда других государств по вопросу определения юридической судьбы эмбрионов в случае несовпадения воль доноров половых гамет. Было выявлено четыре подхода к разрешению подобных ситуаций и уста новлено, что в каждом из нихконституционные права будущих родителей явно превалиру ют над потенциальными интересами эмбриона. Кроме того, было показано, как сами особенности медицинской процедуры приводят к необходимости уничтожения большого коли чества созданных эмбрионов, в связи с чемсделан вывод об отсутствии целесообразности признания за ними прав личности</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="summary"><p>This article is devoted to determining the prospects for recognizing the status of a person for embryos created for the procedure of artificial insemination. To this end, the judicial prac tice of the United States and a number of other states wasinvestigated on the issue of determining the legal fate of embryos in the event of a mismatch between donors of sexual gametes. Four approaches to resolving such situations were identified and found that in each of them the constitution alrights of expectant parents clearly prevail over the potential interests of the embryo. In addition, itwasshown how the very features of the medical procedure lead to the need to destroy a large num ber of created embryos, and therefore itwasconcluded that it wasnotadvisable to recognize their individual rights</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>пренатальные права</kwd><kwd>правосубъектность</kwd><kwd>правовой статус лично сти</kwd><kwd>эмбрион in vitro</kwd><kwd>право на неприкосновенность частной жизни</kwd><kwd>репродуктивная авто номия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prenatal rights</kwd><kwd>legal personality</kwd><kwd>legal status of the individual</kwd><kwd>embryo in vitro</kwd><kwd>right to privacy</kwd><kwd>reproductive autonomy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Пересмотренные статуты Аризоны: // URL: https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/? docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/25/00318-03. html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Приказ Минздрава России от 31.07.2020 N 803н «О порядке использования вспомогатель ныхрепродуктивных технологий, противопоказа ниях и ограничениях к их применению» // URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru. (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение Зюзинского районного суда г. Москвы от 30 июня 2014 года по делу № 33-9401.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Апелляционное определение Москов ского городского суда от 24 марта 2015 г. по делу № 33-9401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Nancy S. Kim. In ReMarriage of Witten: Subordinating Contract to “Public Policy”// Florida State University lawReview.;№ 45. 2018. C. 994998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Kamerlin SCL. In vitro fertilization and the ethics of frozen embryos // URL: https://pmc.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239656/ (дата обраще ния: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Roe v. Wade (1973) // URL: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade/ Opinion_of_the_Court (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Davis v. Davis (1992) // URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/ supreme-court/1992/842-s-w-2d-588-2.html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Kass v. Kass (1998) // URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-ofappeals/1998/91-n-y-2d-554-0.html (дата обраще ния: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу A.Z v. B.Z (2000) // URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/supreme-court/volumes/431/431mass150.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Litowitz v. Litowitz (2002) // URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/ supreme-court/2002/70413-9-4.html (дата обраще ния: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Эванс против Соеди ненного Королевства (2007) // URL: https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/fre#{%22ite mid%22:[%22001-80046%22]} (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Roche v. Roche (2009) // URL: https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2009/ S82.html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Reber v. Reiss (2012) // URL: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/pa-superiorcourt/1598692.html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу Terrel v. Torres (2020) URL: // https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supremecourt/2020/cv-19-0106-pr.html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">Решение по делу LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine (2024) // URL: https://law. justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2024/ sc-2022-0579.html (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">URL: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/ trump-ivf-alabama-2024-republicans (дата обраще ния: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">URL: https://www.pregnancyjusticeus.org/ wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Fetal-personhood.pdf (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="ru">URL: // https://www.mmcginvest.com/post/ fertility-clinics-outlook-us-market-analysis-through2030#:~:text=In%20recent%20years%2C%20 the%20share,quarter%20of%20the%20fertility%20 dollar. (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Revised Arizona Statutes://URL: https:// www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https:// www.azleg.gov/ars/25/00318-03.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 803n dated 31.07.2020 “On the Procedure for Using Assisted Reproductive Technol ogies, Contraindications and Restrictions on Their Use “//URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru. (accessed on: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Decision of the Zyuzinsky District Court of Moscow dated June 30, 2014 in case No. 33-9401.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Appeal ruling of the Moscow City Court dated March 24, 2015 in case No. 33-9401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Nancy S. Kim. In ReMarriage of Witten: Subordinating Contract to “Public Policy”// Florida State University lawReview.;№ 45. 2018. C. 994998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Kamerlin SCL. In vitro fertilization and the ethics of frozen embryos // URL: https://pmc.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11239656/ (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Roe v. Wade (1973 )//URL: https://en.wiki source.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade/Opinion_of_the_Court (Accessed: 11.02.2026) 92 ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ И ПРАВО № 2 • 2026 • ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Decision in Davis v. Davis (1992 )//URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/tennessee/supremecourt/1992/842-s-w-2d-588-2.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Kass v. Kass (1998) Decision//URL: https:// law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-ofappeals/1998/91-n-y-2d-554-0.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Judgment in A.Z v. B.Z (2000 )// URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/massachu setts/supreme-court/volumes/431/431mass150.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Judgment in Litowitz v. Litowitz (2002 )// URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/washington/ supreme-court/2002/70413-9-4.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Evans v. United Kingdom (2007) Decision// URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre # {%22itemid%22: [%22001-80046%22]} (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Roche v. Roche (2009) decision//URL: https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2009/S82.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Reber v. Reiss (2012) Decision//URL: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/pa-superiorcourt/1598692.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">Terrel v. Torres (2020) Decision URL:// https://law.justia.com/cases/arizona/supremecourt/2020/cv-19-0106-pr.html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medi cine (2024) Decision//URL: https://law.justia.com/ cases/alabama/supreme-court/2024/sc-2022-0579. html (Accessed: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">URL: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/ trump-ivf-alabama-2024-republicans (Accessed On: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">URL: https://www.pregnancyjusticeus.org/ wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Fetal-personhood.pdf (дата обращения: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xml:lang="en">URL: // https://www.mmcginvest.com/post/ fertility-clinics-outlook-us-market-analysis-through2030#:~:text=In%20recent%20years%2C%20 the%20share,quarter%20of%20the%20fertility%20 dollar. (accessed on: 11.02.2026)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
