Образование и право2076-150310.24412/2076-1503-2026-3-852-857OtherИмущественная ответственность арбитра в форме возмещения убытков: возможные пути реформированияLiability of an arbitrator in the form of damages: possible ways of reformЧибиновДмитрий ВладиславовичChibinovDmitry Vladislavovichdmchibinov@gmail.comLecturer, Department of Civil Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russiaпреподаватель кафедры гражданского права, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Санкт-Петербург, Россия1004202638528571003202603042026

В статье критикуется регулирование имущественной ответственности арбитра, закрепленное в первом предложении статьи 51 Федерального закона от 29 декабря 2015 года № 382-ФЗ «Об арбитраже (третейском разбирательстве) в Российской Федерации», и предлагаются пути его возможного реформирования.

The article criticizes the current regulation of the arbitrator’s liability as set out in the first sentence of Article 51 of Federal Law No. 382-FZ, which was passed on December 29, 2015, and proposes possible ways to reform it.

иммунитет арбитраответственность арбитратретейские судытретейское разбирательствоарбитражimmunity of the arbitratorresponsibility of the arbitratorarbitral tribunalsarbitration proceedingsarbitrationSevastyanov G.V. Legal nature of arbitration as an institution of alternative dispute resolution (private procedural law). St. Petersburg: Editorial office of the journal “Arbitration Court”, 2015; Moscow: Statut, 2015. Issue 7. 464 p.Commentary on the Federal Law “On Arbitration (Arbitration Proceedings) in the Russian Federation ” (article-by-article, scientific and practical) / V.N. Anurov, K.V. Egorov, A.V. Zamaziy et al.; edited by O.Yu. Moscow: Statut, 2016. 352 p.Brazhnikov V. Diversity under Restrictions // EZh-Yurist. 2016. No. 4 // SPS Garant. URL: https:// base.garant.ru/57310271/ (accessed: 15.02.2026).Schwartz M.Z. On the Legal Regime of Arbitrator Liability: Initial Reflections // Arbitration Court. 2017. No. 2. pp. 144–151.Gerakov R.V. Some Aspects of the Legal Status of an Arbitrator in the Russian Federation // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2019. No. 8. pp. 47–52.Fedorkin S.D. Legal Nature of the Burden of Arbitration: Graduation Thesis; Scientific Hand. G.V. Sevastyanov; Reviewer M.B. Yuryev; Saint Petersburg State University. Faculty of Law. Department of Civil Procedure. – Saint Petersburg, 2017. – 80 p.Julian D. M. Lew, Loukas A. Mistelis et al., Comparative International Commercial Arbitration // Kluwer Law International. 2003. - 953 p.;Li Yat Sen Jason. Arbitral immunity: a profession comes of age. Arbitration 1998, 64(1), p. 51-57.Commentary on the Federal Law “On Arbitration (Arbitration Proceedings) in the Russian Federation ” (article-by-article, scientific and practical / V.N. Anurov, K.V. Egorov, A.V. Zamaziy et al.; edited by O.Yu. Skvortsov, M.Yu. Savransky. Moscow: Statut, 2016. 352 p.Hanotiau Bernard and Mourre Alexis (eds). Players Interaction in International Arbitration, Dossiers of the ICC Institute of World Business Law, Volume 9 // Kluwer Law International; International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). 2012. 184 p.Moses L. Margaret. The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration // Cambridge University Press. 2008. 340 p.Cuniberti Gilles. The Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. A Commentary. – Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar 2022. XCII. 533 p.Ter-Ovakimyan A.A. Legal Status of Arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration: Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow State Law Academy, – Moscow, 2018. – 213 p.Born Gary B., International Commercial Arbitration (Second Edition), 2nd edition // Kluwer Law International; Kluwer Law International 2014. 4260 p.International Commercial Arbitration: Textbook / Scientific ed.: O. Yu. Skvortsov, M. Yu. Savransky, G. V. Sevastyanov. 3rd ed., revised and enlarged. St. Petersburg; Moscow: ANO “Editorial Office of the Journal “Arbitration Court”, 2025. 1005 p.